Mechanical Ventilation in GBS:
Imperative but Also Imperfect
By: Eelco F. M. Wijdicks, M.D.
Mayo Medical Center Rochester, Minnesota
Guillain-Barré Syndrome particularly burdens
patients who need mechanical ventilation. In one of three patients,
it becomes obvious early in the disease that respiratory rate
is increased followed by reduction in tidal volume due to fatigue.
Many patients are sweaty, have a rapid pulse, and can hardly express
their shortness of breath by words. Endotracheal intubation follows
and breathing is assisted using a combination of machine initiated
breathing and spontaneous ventilation. This mode of ventilation
is usually tolerated, although adaptions may be difficult in the
first hours. Some sort of sedation while still easily accusable
may be helpful (e.g., Precedex®). Intubation should be done
early during the day assuring the patient it is a temporary measure
and weaning is expected. Postponing intubation may lead to so-called
''crash'' intubation in the middle of the night which may have
additional complications. Time on the ventilator varies but most
modern intensive care series report a median of 30 days. A tracheotomy
is soon considered. In the vast majority of patients, this is
usually postponed until the third week after intubation, but in
patients with profound bulbar symptoms or in those in which severe
damage to the axons a surgical tracheostomy could be considered
earlier. The timing of tracheostomy is quite complex. Recent studies
done at Mayo Clinic have surfaced new and interesting findings.
From a retrospective review of 60 patients who were mechanically
ventilated following GBS, it was found that serial baseline pulmonary
function test (vital capacity and bugle pressures) can in some
way indicate the readiness of weaning. This scoring system accurately
predicts the duration of ventilation greater than 3 weeks. It
was possible to wean patients off the mechanical ventilator before
tracheostomy could be placed. Another study in GBS patents found
that the time on the ventilator was strongly associated with respiratory
tract complications. Only a few patients who were mechanically
ventilated for greater than three weeks do not have respiratory
complications. Diffuse pneumonitis occurs in half of the patients
who require mechanical ventilation. Aggressive management of atelectasis,
tracheal secretions, and avoidance of corticosteroids that might
increase the risk of these infections is critical. A surveillance
system of respiratory infections may be other appropriate measures
to reduce the severity of infections that could limit the time
on the ventilator. Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving measure
in the severe form of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, but once
on the ventilator, management remains a contentious issue. The
timing of tracheostomy is important because deforming tracheostomy
scars can be avoided in a few patients. We do not know whether
lungs return back to normal in patients who have been on a mechanical
ventilator and did not have underlying lung disease. These critical
care issues deserve much attention.